
Two recent class action lawsuits against Core Scientific and Marathon Digital herald bad news for the Bitcoin mining industry. This action should stand as a warning to the entire crypto ecosystem. Malikie Innovations, one of the most well-known patent trolls, has set its sights on the heart of Bitcoin itself — Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). If they get away with it, the damage would be disastrous. This isn’t only about money; it’s about control.
Centralization Looms Large and Threatens
Now imagine every single Bitcoin transaction requiring a royalty payment. Sounds absurd, right? That’s the safer, healthier future Malikie is working toward. If they win, the impact will be to drive smaller miners out of business. Because at the end of the day, they just won’t be able to afford the attorneys’ fees and licensing fees. This isn't speculation; it's a logical consequence.
Because of this, the mining industry is largely controlled by a handful of major players. They are willing to fight expensive battles or pay to defend their power. This goes against the very decentralized, censorship resistance principles that Bitcoin stands for. We travel from a pervasive permissionless system to one where access is controlled by your ability to afford the toll.
It feels like being back in the internet land-grab days, when companies were seeking patents on really fundamental web technologies. In response, the open-source movement raised up a powerful counterargument – that these technologies needed to be openly available and beneficial to all. Bitcoin could use that same kind of concerted community effort today.
Stifled Innovation Is A Real Threat
In addition to centralization, the other outcome of successful patent trolling is innovation dampening. Why would developers be incentivized to invent new and better mining methods if at the end of the invention process they could be sued for patent infringement. The threat of lawsuits certainly will be a creative killer — the fear of litigation will serve as a creative wet blanket.
Think about it. Bitcoin’s power comes from its open-source development ethos and the never-ending series of improvements to the network’s code by developers across the globe. If that stream dries up, Bitcoin is left sitting still on its past success and increasingly at risk from newer, more ambitious, more disruptive cryptocurrencies. The broader chilling effect on development would go well beyond mining, harming wallet providers and node operators in the process.
Patents are an important means of protecting investments in new drugs. They can lead to exorbitant prices, pricing people out of life-saving drugs. A similar scenario is likely to play out in the Bitcoin universe. Under this picture, patents become instruments of profit-appropriation rather than innovation-promotion.
Echoes Of Past Fights Resonate Loudly
This patent escalation isn’t the first time patents have been weaponized against open-source technologies. Remember the SCO Group's lawsuit against Linux? Or the over a dozen patent wars waged against each other by the inventors of Wi-Fi and podcasting? We can’t let history repeat itself. We’ve got to learn from it.
These examples underscore how vital it is for us to have a powerful, coordinated defense. The Bitcoin community needs to come together to support Core Scientific and Marathon Digital. They must appropriate the money needed to mount successful challenges to Malikie’s patents through Inter Partes Review (IPR).
Paul Grewal's words resonate deeply: "Patent trolls are barriers to innovation and must be stopped." He's absolutely right. This isn’t even just about protecting Bitcoin either, it’s about protecting the future of open-source innovation.
The good news is that the Bitcoin community is already mobilizing. There’s a pipeline of developers looking to adopt defensive strategies, and conversations are already happening to fund IPR challenges. We require more than just technical solutions. We need a shift in mindset. We need to start treating this like the existential threat to Bitcoin’s decentralization and censorship resistance that it is.
Feature | Current State | Potential Future (Malikie Wins) |
---|---|---|
Mining Decentralization | Relatively decentralized | Increased centralization |
Innovation | Rapid development and improvement | Stifled innovation, reduced development |
Access | Permissionless, open to all | Restricted by licensing fees and regulations |
Legal Costs | Minimal | Significantly increased |
This is not somebody else’s issue, this is our issue. If we fail to act in the right way, we will lose Bitcoin’s future, and that’s what makes this threat so existential. We can’t allow patent trolls to blow the tech revolution off course.
So, what can you do?
- Spread awareness: Share this article and other information about the Malikie lawsuit.
- Support the legal defense: Contribute to efforts to fund IPR challenges and other legal strategies.
- Advocate for patent reform: Contact your elected officials and urge them to support legislation that curbs patent trolling.
This isn't someone else's problem; it's our problem. The future of Bitcoin depends on how we respond to this threat. Let's not let patent trolls derail the revolution.
Let's fight this together.

Tran Quoc Duy
Blockchain Editor
Tran Quoc Duy offers centrist, well-grounded blockchain analysis, focusing on practical risks and utility in cryptocurrency domains. His analytical depth and subtle humor bring a thoughtful, measured voice to staking and mining topics. In his spare time, he enjoys landscape painting and classic science fiction novels.